Top pro-Israel lawyer faked attack in plot to frame Palestine group
Lawyer Matthew Berlow faces £500 fine for his part in plot (Image: Daily Record)
Matthew Berlow played a key part in faking a graffiti attack at his home, then used the bogus incident to smear the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign. His accomplice was a teacher who used a false identity to fake ‘antisemitic’ comments. Both men are connected to the Friends of Israel lobby group.
By Mark McGivern, reposted from the Scottish newspaper Daily Record
A top lawyer has been slammed by legal watchdogs for a bizarre plot to discredit a Palestinian pressure group.
Matthew Berlow played a key part in faking a graffiti attack at his home then used the bogus incident to smear the
Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
He now faces a £500 fine for his part in the conspiracy after an initial probe by the reporter of the Law Society of Scotland.
Berlow knew his associate Ed Sutherland, a teacher at Belmont Academy, Ayr, had created a
fake Facebook identity under the name Stevie Harrison to infiltrate the SPSC in January last year.
Teacher Ed Sutherland created a fake profile on Facebook which contained ‘antisemitic’ posts and the graffiti claim. Sutherland, a leading figure in the Confederation of Friends of Israel, is head of religious and moral education at a Scottish school. (Image: Jamie Williamson)
Berlow and Sutherland are linked to Friends of Israel, which aims to promote the interests of the country in the UK.
The fake Palestinian supporting activist “Stevie Harrison” wrote a social media post highlighting vandalism daubed on Berlow’s home in
The post said: “A certain Jewish lawyer woke up this morning to find ‘Free Palestine’ spray-painted rather prominently – no idea who was responsible.”
Berlow fuelled the story of the fantasy attack by playing the victim and commenting on the post: “Idiocy. Typical SPSC behaviour criminal.”
He later admitted to the LSS that he knew the scenario to be faked. But he claimed he went along with it because the Harrison character was being used “to monitor various disruptive activities of the SPSC”.
A preliminary ruling found Berlow failed to maintain the standards of behaviour expected for a solicitor.
It stated: “The pertinent issue is the solicitor’s comment, ‘Typical SPSC behaviour’ and the association between the SPSC and the supposed act of vandalism in the post. The post was made by the alias Stevie Harrison.
“The reporter has been provided with no evidence to find that Harrison was recognised as a member of the SPSC.
“Conversely, as the reporter is satisfied that Harrison is an alias and the social media profile fake, Harrison would naturally be unable to attend any demonstrations or meetings organised by the SPSC.
(Image: Daily Record)
“Furthermore, following the words ‘no idea who was responsible’, there are a number of emojis portraying a wink.
“The reporter is satisfied that the choice of the words and emoji were intended for readers of the post to draw the inference that the act of vandalism had been committed by Harrison.
“The reporter is therefore satisfied that the comment made by the solicitor associating the act of vandalism with the SPSC was unfounded.”
The LSS reporter also makes it clear it was part of a plot by Berlow and a “Mr Y” – who can be identified as Ed Sutherland and who faces his own probe by the General Teaching Council for Scotland.
The reporter states: “Mr Y, like the solicitor, is a
supporter of the state of Israel.
“The reporter is satisfied that Mr Y impersonates an anti-Israeli activist and in order to convince other anti-Israeli activists, Mr Y targets Israeli supporters, including the solicitor.
“The reporter is satisfied that when commenting on the post, the solicitor would have known that the post was false and no vandalism had taken place.
“The reporter is satisfied that the purpose of the comment was to associate the ostensibly criminal act with members of the SPSC despite the solicitor being aware at the material time that no criminal act had taken place.”