AP’s articles on Ilhan Omar left out much of the story

The story then included comments on “both sides.” The problem is that the article gave significantly more space to individuals who claimed Omar is “antisemitic” as to those who defended her.

While the long article includes quotes from local Jewish and Muslim communities, it failed to include comments from a Christian organization in the area that focuses on Palestine,  which could have described how false claims of antisemitism are often used to silence criticism of Israel.

The short version

AP also sent out a short version of the story, which seems to have been disseminated first. This version was even more prejudicial to Omar. It went to some newspapers and, especially, to radio and TV news programs.

In this report, only the accusations against Omar were published. There was no indication whatsoever that there are people who disagree with the accusations of antisemitism, believe her comments to be valid, and support her.

What else AP left out

The AP article also fails to include the fact that numerous experts have confirmed Omar’s point that the Israel lobby has a massive and damaging influence on U.S. policies.

Fortune magazine calls AIPAC “the biggest, most powerful group in the Israel Lobby.”

According to Fortune, AIPAC has “serious juice when it comes to Washington politicking. The group has one of the most sophisticated lobbying efforts around, including a highly professional set of lobbyists on the Hill who know how to get congressman to vote their way when it comes to issues affecting Israel.”

Former AIPAC official M.J. Rosenberg writes: “AIPAC’s political operation is used precisely as Representative Omar suggested.”

Rosenberg says: “The power of AIPAC over members of Congress is literally awesome, although not in a good way.”

Former Congressional campaign staffer Ady Barkan reports: “As a Jew, an Israeli citizen, and a professional lobbyist (ahem, activist), I speak from personal experience when I say that AIPAC is tremendously effective, and the lubricant that makes its operation hum is dollar, dollar bills.”

International scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt’s book and London Review of Books article on the Israel Lobby document this power. They state:

“The bottom line is that AIPAC, a de facto agent for a foreign government, has a stranglehold on Congress.”

A reviewer of their best-selling book wrote: “To almost anyone with experience in American electoral politics, Mearsheimer and Walt were stating the obvious: The near unanimity of politicians’ support for Israel resulted not from inborn Zionist sympathies, but rather organizing and influence—which in Washington invariably involves money.”

AIPAC is a “leviathan among lobbies”

Many Israel partisans have also previously made Omar’s point.

New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman described Congress’s 23 standing ovations for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as having been “bought and paid for by the Israel lobby.”

Jeffrey Goldberg, an Israeli citizen who served in the Israeli military, currently editor of The Atlantic, called AIPAC a “leviathan among lobbies, as influential in its sphere as the National Rifle Association and the American Association of Retired Persons are in theirs.”

J.J. Goldberg, columnist for the Jewish weekly newspaper The Forward, said regarding AIPAC, “There is this image in Congress that you don’t cross these people or they take you down.”

As a result of this lobby, Congress is currently poised to pass a $38 billion package to Israel, the largest such aid package in U.S. history. The aid, to be given to Israel over a 10-year period (and which will likely go even higher), works out to over $7,000 per minute and is about $23,000 per every Jewish Israeli family of four.

AP has failed to inform Americans about this legislation.

AP’s pattern of distorted reporting

AP, which normally provides valuable reporting, has a record of providing slanted coverage on Israel-Palestine.

In the past several years, our organization has conducted two statistical studies on AP reports. Both revealed notable distortion.

A study of AP’s 2004 reports showed that AP had covered Israeli children’s deaths at a rate 7.5 times greater than they reported on Palestinian children’s deaths, which were far greater and had occurred first.

A 2018 study revealed that AP headlines reported on Israeli deaths at a rate four times greater than on Palestinian deaths, and that articles on Israeli deaths were almost three times longer than those on Palestinian deaths. In addition, the study found that essential information was often missing from the AP reports.

Perhaps this distortion is related to the fact that AP’s control bureau in the region is largely staffed by Israeli journalists, who write and edit the AP reports that are sent to the U.S. – even those carrying a Palestinian byline.

Americans need and want full coverage, not slanted journalism, on all topics, including Israel-Palestine. AP can and should do better.

To contact AP about this go here.