In a confrontation with BBC news chief Richard Burgess, journalist Peter Oborne sets out six ways the state broadcaster has wilfully misled audiences on Israel’s destruction of Gaza
I was fired from my position as a Professor of Medicine at the University of California San Fransisco, for speaking out against racism that leads to genocide.
Antisemitism is used by Israel to divert focus from its genocide in Gaza, the real material violence that we should be condemning.
Israeli forces kills more than 70 in Gaza, including 36 aid-seekers, 3 more in West Bank; post-Madleen, Global March To Gaza is the latest campaign to break the siege; Amb. Huckabee says two-state solution is dead; France’s ‘uninterrupted flow’ of weapons to Israel; IAEA an ‘instrument for Israel’; more
Western media struggles to state reality plainly: Palestinians face a grim choice—die of hunger or die trying to get food aid amid deadly distribution attacks, both at the hands of Israel.
Jonathan Greenblatt seems to think that criticism of Israel’s brutal acts, not the acts themselves, could promote a violent response from observers abroad.
When future generations read about Gaza with horror and wonder how we allowed a live streamed genocide to happen, what will you say?
At a critical time where our people in Gaza face starvation, forced displacement, and genocide; we must make clear that there is no compromise or capitulation.
Researchers from Israel, the Netherlands, the US, the UK, Australia, Croatia and Canada say Israel’s conduct meets the legal threshold of genocide.
Google’s acquisition of Israeli software company Wiz, for $32 billion, shows just how much Silicon Valley is invested in Israeli tech. The problem is, almost all of Israeli tech is first developed by a genocidal army.