By Alison Weir
Jewish Insider reports today: “Jewish groups lobby Biden on IHRA’s working definition of antisemitism.” The IHRA definition is a non-traditional definition promoted by Israel partisans in which many negative factual statements about Israel are considered “antisemitic.”
The definition is based on a formulation proposed by an Israeli official in 2004 that has been promoted world wide.
The letter, sent to President-elect Joe Biden by the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations on January 12th, calls on “all federal departments and agencies” to use the definition.
The letter is signed by Conference of Presidents officials on behalf of its members and by the heads of the Jewish Federations of North America, the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of America, and the Orthodox Union. The Presidents’ Conference consists of 53 Jewish organizations.
The letter asks to meet with the Biden transition team and incoming administration members to discuss the matter.
Progressive Israel Network opposes action
In response, the Progressive Israel Network, comprised of nine members, issued a counter statement opposing the use of the new definition:
As organizations that care deeply about the State of Israel and about the wellbeing of the Jewish people, we are deeply committed to the struggle against antisemitism. We are thus obligated to share our concerns about ways in which the effort to combat antisemitism is being misused and exploited to instead suppress legitimate free speech, criticism of Israeli government actions, and advocacy for Palestinian rights. In particular, the effort to enshrine in domestic law and institutional policy the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism, with its accompanying “contemporary examples,” risks wrongly equating what may be legitimate activities with antisemitism.
Using definition is ‘attack on academic freedom & free speech’
The groups’ statement points out that one of the original drafters of the definition “has written that it was never intended to be used as a sweeping, all-purpose hate speech code” and that its use as such “is an attack on academic freedom and free speech.”
Both Biden and Harris have consistently supported Israel, despite Israel’s human rights violations, systemic discrimination, and daily violence against Palestinian men, women, and children.
However, the party’s grassroots members increasingly support Palestinian rights.
It is unclear whether the Presidents’ Conference or the Progressive Network will most influence the new administration, although the combined budget of the Presidents’ Conference members dwarfs the financial resources of its opposition.
Our operations are funded solely by generous individuals like you. Your contribution will help us continue shining a light on the Israel/Palestine situation and the U.S. connection.DONATE
Alison Weir is executive director of If Americans Knew, president of the Council for the National Interest, and author of Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel.
- International campaign is criminalizing criticism of Israel as ‘antisemitism’
- Jewish Congress launches campaign against ‘antisemitism’ (aka support for Palestinian rights)
- Congressional bill would apply Israel-centric definition of antisemitism to campuses
- Landmark bill restricting criticism of Israel sneaks through South Carolina Senate
- Anti-Semitism Envoy Elan Carr puts Israel (not Jews) front and center
- Exposed! How Britain’s Anti-Semitism scaremongers operate
- ADL data on increase of incidents disputed
- World Jewish Congress: Billionaires, Oligarchs, Global Influencers for Israel